In a dramatic turn of events, South Korea declared and lifted martial law within hours on Tuesday night, sparking a constitutional crisis and nationwide protests.
President Yoon Suk Yeol announced emergency martial law in a televised address, claiming it was necessary to counteract alleged “anti-state activities” and pro-North Korean forces threatening the constitution.
The declaration marked the first instance of martial law in South Korea in decades, sending shockwaves through the country.
“To safeguard a liberal South Korea and eliminate anti-state elements, I hereby declare emergency martial law,” said Yoon.
However, the decision faced immediate backlash, with opposition lawmakers mobilizing to counter the move.
Parliament Pushes Back Against Martial Law
Opposition members of the South Korean National Assembly convened urgently, despite military blockades around the legislative building.
Of the 300-member parliament, 190 legislators managed to enter the chamber, exceeding the quorum required to reject the decree.
Also Read: Unknown suspect stabs South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae Myung in the neck
By early Wednesday morning, lawmakers had unanimously overturned the order.
Outside the assembly, protests erupted, with demonstrators chanting against the president and demanding his impeachment.
Security forces maintained a heavy presence as tensions flared between protesters and authorities.
Yoon Justifies Martial Law Amid Criticism
President Yoon defended the short-lived martial law by accusing his political opponents of destabilizing the government.
“This is a fight to protect South Korea from internal and external threats,” he stated, referencing alleged ties between opposition factions and North Korea.
Critics, however, argue the move was an overreach, citing months of political deadlock and impeachment attempts as underlying motives.
The swift withdrawal of martial law ended the immediate crisis, but the incident has deepened political divisions.
Protests continue as calls for Yoon’s resignation grow louder. Observers worry the event could damage South Korea’s democratic image on the global stage.
This unprecedented event has left many pondering what martial law means in a democracy and whether the turmoil signals a larger shift in South Korea’s political landscape.
Also Read: Philippine Groups Unite to Remember 51st Anniversary of Martial Law Declaration
To know more about the current issue, read the details below!
How does martial law in South Korea compare to martial law in other countries, such as the Philippines?
In South Korea, the recent emergency martial law declared by President Yoon Suk Yeol was politically motivated and swiftly overturned by the parliament, emphasizing the role of democracy and legal checks.
Conversely, martial law Philippines history, notably during Ferdinand Marcos’ rule, was implemented to suppress dissent over an extended period, leading to authoritarianism. The swift repeal of korea martial law 2024 underscores South Korea’s robust democratic institutions compared to past martial law declarations elsewhere.
What safeguards exist to prevent prolonged martial law in South Korea?
South Korea’s democratic framework provides significant checks on power, such as the role of the parliament in overriding a presidential decree. The swift action by lawmakers to overturn South Korea martial law demonstrates the strength of these institutions.
Additionally, widespread public engagement, protests, and scrutiny by international media like ABS-CBN News ensure that any overreach, such as the recent SK martial law, is challenged promptly. This event underscores the resilience of democratic safeguards in Korea news amidst crises.
Keep Reading: North Korea closes agencies working for reunification with South Korea
Leave a Reply