Netizens criticize the Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) for taking sides in the ongoing controversy surrounding HYBE and its artists.
On December 13, KST, the KMCA released a statement addressing NewJeans’ decision to terminate their contract with ADOR, labeling it as “tampering.”
The association emphasized the need to eradicate such practices to maintain stability in the K-pop industry, sparking backlash online.
The KMCA Korea statement urged music programs and award shows to exclude artists and agencies allegedly involved in tampering.
They expressed concern over the growing trend, saying, “The Korea Music Content Association expresses deep concern about the tampering attempts that have recently become an issue in the popular music industry and declares that it will make every effort to eradicate tampering that could shake the foundation of the Korean popular music industry.”
KMCA Issues a Statement Urging NewJeans Members to Return to ADOR… https://t.co/42FtisWCpP
— 1tokki (@juantokki) December 13, 2024
Below is the full statement from the Korea Music Content Association (KMCA):
The Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) is committed to eradicating tampering that threatens to… pic.twitter.com/z7klfpYHfC
The KMCA specifically referenced controversies involving NewJeans and Ablume. NewJeans’ press conference earlier this month addressed their contract termination, with fans questioning HYBE’s treatment of the group.
Also Read: ADOR Responds to NewJeans Contract Termination in 22-Page Letter
Similarly, Ablume, formed by former members of FIFTY FIFTY, also faced allegations of contract violations when they left their previous agency.
The statement quickly drew criticism from netizens, who accused the KMCA of unfairly targeting artists instead of addressing deeper, systemic issues.
Fans rallied around NewJeans and Ablume, arguing that penalizing them could discourage other K-Pop groups from speaking out against alleged mistreatment.
KMCA is urging music shows and award shows to boycott newjeans for leaving their shitty agency, calling it 'tampering.' Instead of addressing artist mistreatment or unfair contracts, they’re protecting exploitative agencies to no one’s surprise 🤷🏻♀️ https://t.co/yYUbOpPLR1
— p ౨ৎ˚⟡.• (@sooshucult) December 13, 2024
This is DISGUSTING btw what happened to protecting Artists??? https://t.co/oYmdUldUP1
— Nance🧸 (@letjustinkook) December 13, 2024
so just blacklisting artists who dare to speak out about their working conditions… https://t.co/1U4TSaPnlZ
— nora 🍉 (@ablumesvt) December 13, 2024
KMCA’s action is disgusting, like a lapdog. Instead of supporting the growth of the K-pop industry and helping it flourish on a global stage, as NewJeans is doing, they’re pushing for a return to slave contract that many idols are struggling with. It’s deeply downcast. https://t.co/58wYo8mGXL
— My MBTI is ILJZ (@catnipzbro) December 13, 2024
Questions like “Did NewJeans disband?” have circulated online, highlighting growing fan concerns. Supporters believe NewJeans and Ablume’s decisions reflect genuine grievances and should not be dismissed as tampering.
The controversy underscores ongoing tensions within the K-pop industry, with many demanding structural reforms instead of punitive measures.
Fans continue to call for fairness, urging the KMCA to focus on protecting artists rather than defending corporate interests.
Also Read: NewJeans Speaks Out Against HYBE’s Dismissal of Min Hee Jin
If you want to know more about NewJeans and Ablume, here are additional information:
Why is the issue of “tampering” significant in the K-Pop industry?
The KMCA Korea defines tampering as a serious issue that destabilizes the music industry. However, netizens argue that the term is being misused in cases involving NewJeans and Ablume K-Pop, where artists claim mistreatment.
Many fans think this focus on tampering distracts from addressing larger, systemic problems like unfair contracts and agency behavior.
What happened at the recent NewJeans press conference, and why are fans questioning the KMCA’s stance?
At the NewJeans press conference, the group discussed their decision to terminate their contract with ADOR, citing grievances with their agency.
Fans argue that the KMCA’s decision to label this as tampering targets artists rather than addressing deeper structural issues. Questions like “Did NewJeans disband?” emerged as fans grew more concerned about the group’s future and well-being.
How does the situation with Ablume compare to NewJeans’ case?
Ablume was formed by three former FIFTY FIFTY members who left their previous agency amid allegations of contract violations. Like NewJeans, Ablume’s situation highlights growing disputes between artists and their agencies.
Fans argue that penalizing groups like NewJeans and Ablume discourages artists from speaking out against unfair treatment, raising concerns about artist rights and agency practices in the K-Pop industry.
Keep Reading: Former FIFTY FIFTY members Sio, Aran and Saena Set to Redebut as Ablume, Teasing Fans with a Concept Photo Shoot
Leave a Reply